AI search visibility
generative engine optimisation
Your buyers ask ChatGPT before they ask you. We make sure the answer includes your name — no acronym worship, no scare tactics, just the mechanics of getting cited.

Generative engine optimisation (GEO) is the work of getting your business named and cited when ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Google's AI Overviews answer a question you should own. Not ranked on a results page — actually written into the answer. Same goal search has always had, different machinery underneath.
You're probably here for one of two reasons. Either your MD asked "why doesn't ChatGPT mention us?" and you need a proper answer, or you've seen the acronym soup and suspect the whole category is repackaged snake oil. Both fair. This page explains what the work actually is — and what it isn't.
When someone asks an AI assistant for the best supplier in your category, the model doesn't serve ten links. It retrieves a handful of sources it trusts, synthesises them into one answer, and names the businesses those sources agree on. Generative engine optimisation is how you become one of those businesses: described the same way everywhere, vouched for by people who aren't you, and easy for a model to find and quote without embarrassing itself.
There's no backdoor. Nobody can inject your brand into a model, and anyone claiming otherwise is selling you a haunted amulet. What you can do is stack the inputs: make your site unambiguous about who you are, publish content that answers real buyer questions directly, and earn enough independent coverage that citing you is the low-risk choice. The rest is diligence and repetition.
Models don't take your word for who you are. They take everyone else's.
The industry couldn't agree on a name, so it minted four. GEO. AEO — answer engine optimisation. AIO. LLMO. They all describe the same job: making your business visible in AI-generated answers. Answer engine optimisation leans on the "answer" framing, AI search optimisation on the "search" one, but the audit is the same, the levers are the same and the deliverables are the same.
Why should you care? Because some agencies sell these as separate services with separate retainers, which is a pricing strategy dressed up as a service catalogue. We say generative engine optimisation because it's the term most people search — not because it's a distinct discipline that deserves its own line on your invoice.
Three levers, none of them secret. Every credible GEO engagement is some weighting of these.
Models hedge when they're unsure what you are. If your site describes you five different ways, your directory listings disagree and your schema markup is missing, you're a risky citation. We tighten the story: one clear description of what you do and who it's for, structured data that repeats it in machine-readable form, and consistency everywhere your name appears.
Retrieval systems hunt for passages that answer the question outright. Pages that bury the answer under four hundred words of preamble don't get lifted. We restructure your key pages so the direct answer comes first, headings match the questions buyers actually ask assistants, and every claim is specific enough to quote.
The heaviest lever, and the one you can't fake. Models weight independent sources — trade press, industry publications, credible directories — far more than anything you say about yourself. Coverage and citations earned through digital PR are what turn "this company says it's good" into "multiple sources agree". If a GEO pitch doesn't mention earned media, it's missing the engine.
Every deliverable is named before you sign. Here's what a discoweb GEO engagement actually contains:
That's the service. If a deliverable isn't on the list, you're not paying for it.
By asking the machines. You run the questions your buyers ask — hundreds of them, phrased the way real people phrase things — against ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews, then track who gets mentioned, who gets cited and how you're described. Ask a model the same question twice and you'll get two different answers, so one prompt proves nothing — repeat the test, count the mentions, and you've got the only honest measure.
Measurement is a discipline in its own right, so it gets its own page. See AI visibility tracking for how we baseline your presence, benchmark it against competitors and report without vanity metrics.
Every AI assistant that cites sources leans on search indexes and crawlers to find them. If your site is slow, unindexed or thin, no amount of GEO wizardry saves you — the model can't cite what retrieval never surfaces. GEO is a layer on top of solid SEO, not a replacement for it, and it inherits every foundation SEO lays: crawlability, site structure, content quality, authority.
That's why GEO sits alongside technical SEO, content and links in our full list of services rather than off in a shiny silo. These channels feed each other, or they starve together.
Because we'll tell you the boring truth: GEO is earned, compounding work — and that's the pitch. You get named deliverables, plain-English reporting, and a UK team built for B2B firms that need commercial results, not thought leadership about the singularity.
If you want the whole engagement — SEO foundations, GEO and visibility tracking under one retainer — that's our AI SEO agency service. If you want GEO done properly on top of SEO you've already got covered, you're on the right page.
Ask us what ChatGPT says about you right now. We'll show you the entity audit — warts and all.
Get your entity auditExpect early movement within a few months and meaningful change over six to twelve, depending on how visible you already are. Entity fixes and answer-shaped rewrites can surface quickly because models retrieve fresh content; earned third-party coverage compounds more slowly. Anyone promising specific mentions by a specific date is guessing — what you can control is the inputs, measured honestly over time.
Yes — same job, different badge. Answer engine optimisation (AEO), AI search optimisation and GEO all describe making your business visible and citable in AI-generated answers. The naming fight is a branding squabble between vendors, not a technical distinction. If an agency quotes for them as separate services, that's a red flag, not a broader offering.
Yes. AI assistants find their sources through search indexes and web crawlers, so crawlability, site health and content quality remain the foundation GEO stands on. A technically weak site caps how far any GEO work can go. Treat GEO as the layer that makes strong SEO legible and citable to models — not as its successor.
The entity audit sets the price, because it sets the scope. A firm the models already half-know needs answer-shaped rewrites and a handful of citations; a firm they've never heard of needs the full corroboration job, and that's a different bill. We quote line by line against the audit, so the invoice reads like the deliverables list on this page — not a retainer with a fog machine attached.
No — and nobody honest can. Model outputs are probabilistic and change between versions, so guarantees of specific mentions are marketing fiction. What generative engine optimisation can do is measurably improve the inputs models rely on — entity clarity, answer-shaped content, independent citations — and track your share of mentions against competitors through sampled prompt testing.